Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

2014년 2학기 경희대학교 국어국문학과 담당: 김양진

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "2014년 2학기 경희대학교 국어국문학과 담당: 김양진"— Presentation transcript:

1 2014년 2학기 경희대학교 국어국문학과 담당: 김양진
국어문법론 강의안(3장) 2014년 2학기 경희대학교 국어국문학과 담당: 김양진

2 3. Short history of Korean linguistics of grammar
Traditional Study of Grammar endeavors to express Korean using Chinese characters : Seogiche-natation[誓記體表記], Idu[吏讀], Hyangchal[鄕札], Gugyeol[口訣] 등 In Hyangchal and Gugyeol, we can be confermed that the 2 inflectional categories, i.e. nominal-affixes and verbal-affixes were distinguished. 1. 乙 and 尸 : 乙 is a NP-affix(that is object case-affix 을/를), 尸 is a VP-affix(that is adnominal ending ‘-ㄹ/을’) 2. There are distinguished NP-affixes and VP-affixes NP-affixes : 乙, 矣/衣(의), 中(에), 臥/果(와/과), 万(만), … VP-affixes : 尸, 音(-ㅁ/-음), 多(-다), 羅(-라), 齊(-제), 去(-거-), 乎(-오-), 飛(-나-), 賜(-시-), …

3 Middle Korean Nominals, Verbals, and Grammatical units were distinguished. Nominal-class : X는 N이라. (國 나라히라/新은 새라) Predicate-class : X는 Vㄹ씨라.(異 다를씨라/制는 씨라) Expletive-class : X는 입겨지라.(之 입겨지라/於는 아모그 논 겨체 쓰는 字ㅣ라)

4 Modern Korean 1 : the grammatical consciousness of silhak-scholar(scholar of the Realist School of Confucianism) In the traditional Idu-way orthography and the study on translation of the Sayeokwon[司譯院], More thorough understanding on the Korean grammar The Sin[申景濬]’s [訓民正音韻解] An item in ‘語辭終聲’, 助辭 : 東方之語甚敏 中國之一字 非但以二三字呼之 而其語截處 助辭甚多 多至五六字 以吏讀觀之 可知也… 是乎(이온), 爲白去乎(거온).. 語助辭(終結語尾) : “語之終 多用羅多阿ㅏ也所古吾之置 等辭 皆支攝內聲也”…. 一以爲句節分明之道 一以防推移弄奸之辭

5 Modern Korean 2: The Official Translaters’ Grammar
Modern view of grammar had been established Lee(李鳳雲)’s [國文正理](1897) : 語吐名目 – on the Chinese study in Ching[淸] era The past[過去](엿네다, 엿소, 엿다), The future[未來](겠네다, 겟소, 겟다), The present[現在](네다, 오, 다), the imperative[命令](시오, 오, 여라), The prohibition[禁止](맙시오, 마오, 말라), the antonym[反辭](아니겠네다, 아니겟소 ), the request[動辭](시다, 세, 자), the adverb[語助](대개, 가령, 대뎌, 므릇), the capacity[範圍](능히, 범, 위, 부득불), the subordinate conjunction [連辭](고, 야, 며, 니), the exclamation[讚揚](혜여, 로다, 여, 이여), the declarative[文辭](라, 지라, 리오, 로다), the coordinate conjunction[相對](오, 요, 며, 고), the supposition[疑訝](여도, 지, 듯, 나 ), the cause[緣故](고로, 으로, 로, 니), 自爲反辭(나, 지, 너라), 限定( 지, 큼, 쯤, 얼), the interrogative[問辭](넷, 냐, 뎃, 더냐), the response[答辭](네다, 오, 다, 데다), the configuration[形容](모양, 형샹, 꼴, 양), the manner[態度](즛)

6 Modern Korean Grammar 3 : Foreign missionaries’ study of Korean Grammar
The approch in needs for evangelization : They have made quit massive effects on Korean grammarians afterwards. Dallet, 「朝鮮語」, 1874 Ross, 「朝鮮語初步」, 1877 Ridel, 「韓語文法」, 1881 Underwood, 「韓英文法」, 1890 등

7 Modern Korean Grammar 4 : Korean grammarians’ Korean Grammar
The primary Korean grammar –Yu[兪吉濬]’s 「朝鮮文典」(Tokyo: 1906). According to Latinate grammar, he divided eight parts of speech(名詞, 代名詞, 動詞, 形容詞, 副詞, 後詞(助詞), 接續詞(助詞, 語尾), 感歎詞), and he set-up four constituent of sentence(主語, 說明語, 客語, 修飾語) for the Korean Ju[周時經]’s studies of the korean grammar 「國文文法」(1905년경 필사), 「國語文法」(1910) : nine parts of speech 「말의 소리」(1914) : six parts of speech. 임(Noun), 엇(adjetive), 움(verb), 겻(), 잇(conjunct), 긋(final) In 「國文文法」 , after establishing ‘기(씨)’ and ‘다’, he divided ‘다’ as the three units ‘모(句)’, ‘드(文)’, ‘미(發話)’ In 「말의 소리」, he created ‘늣씨(元詞)’ corresponding to Morpheme

8 Modern Korean Grammar 5 ; Japanese Grammarians’ Korean grammar.
前間恭作의 [韓語通](1909) : 大槻文彦(1897)에 따라 10품사(名詞, 數詞, 代名詞, 動詞, 形容詞, 副詞, 接續詞, 感動詞, 弔異乎波, 助動詞)를 설정. 명사 : 말음절에 따라 분류, 冠形詞를 接頭語로 처리. 수사 : 명사의 성질을 가진 것, 명사 위에 冠하는 것, 年月日을 표하는 것, 順位를 표하는 것의 네 가지로 구분 대명사 : 人代名詞와 疑問代名詞로 구분. 인대명사는 다시 第一人稱, 第二人稱, 第三人稱으로, 의문대명사는 다시 人(누), 事物(무엇), 場所(어디), 時(언제), 不定(아무), 數(몇), 指示(어느) 등으로 구분하여 설명. 용언(동사+형용사) : 어간을 받침에 따라 분류. 相을 所相, 勢相, 使役相으로 나누고 尊稱을 둠. 敍法은 直說法, 疑問法, 命令法, 連用法, 接續法, 連體法, 揷入法, 不定法으로 나누어 설명. 존재사 : ‘잇-’(有), ‘업-’(無), ‘계시-’(在)를 동사와 형용사 중간에 있는 것으로 봄. 조사 : 弔異乎波는 일본어의 助詞와 대응시켜 설명.

9 高橋亨의 [韓語文法](1909) Following to 大槻文彦(1897), he sets up 10 part of speech. Declensional element(名詞, 數詞, 代名詞), conjugational element(形容詞, 助動詞) and adverbials(副詞), conjunct(接續詞), exclamation(感動詞), assistant element(助詞). 代名詞: 人稱(自稱, 對稱, 他稱, 不定稱), 事物(近稱, 遠稱, 中稱) 體言 : 助動詞 ‘이다’+ 疑問, 指定, 時間 等. 用言(動詞+形容詞) : 助動詞(affix+ending)+活用. 變格活用. 動詞의 性 : 自動, 他動. 動詞의 相 : 通常, 使役, 被動. 助動詞, 助詞

10 <the 3 types of inquiries on Korean grammar>
Lee(李克魯, 1935, “임자씨의 토”) : Three view of ‘토(the korean agglutinate affix). First, all ‘토’ is word. Second, the nominal-‘토’ is word and the verbal-’토’ is an ending. Third, all ‘토’ is an ending Kim(金敏銖, 1954/1960) : Three view of Korean Grammar The first type – analysis system : Both of the nominal-‘토’ and the verbal-’토’ is a word. Ju(周時經) etc. 그 | 꽃 | 이 | 퍽 | 곱 | 다 (6word) The second type – eclectic system : the nominal-‘토’ is a word and the verbal-’토’ is not a word. Choi(崔鉉培) etc. 그 | 꽃 | 이 | 퍽 | 곱다   (5word) The third type – synthetic system : Both of the nominal-‘토’ and the verbal-’토’ is not a word. Cheong(鄭烈模) etc. 그 | 꽃이 | 퍽 | 곱다      (4word)

11 Present-day Korean grammar
Structural Grammar(構造文法) : after mid-1950’s, to introduce the structural grammar of the West. Martin(1954), Lukoff(1954), … Jang(장하일, 1957), Kim(김민수, 1960) Generative Grammar(生成文法): after 1970’s, to introduce the transformational generative Grammar of Chomsky(1957, 1965). Lee(이홍배, 1968), Lee(이혜숙), Yang(양동휘), … Kim(김민수, 1968), Hong(홍웅선), … Functional Grammar(機能文法) : after 1990’s, Gibon, Filmore, … New approaching about to interrelationship of meaning and language form.

12 【연습 문제】 1. Check this out: how previous grammar books treat case markers and verbal inflection affixes. Do you agree with them? 2. What is the ‘늣씨’(nus.ssi) of Ju sigieong? cf. 김민수(1977) or 이병근(1979).


Download ppt "2014년 2학기 경희대학교 국어국문학과 담당: 김양진"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google