Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Chapter 14 Instruction Level Parallelism and Superscalar Processors

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Chapter 14 Instruction Level Parallelism and Superscalar Processors"— Presentation transcript:

1 Chapter 14 Instruction Level Parallelism and Superscalar Processors

2 Equally applicable to RISC & CISC In practice usually RISC
What is Superscalar? Common instructions (arithmetic, load/store, conditional branch) can be initiated and executed independently Equally applicable to RISC & CISC In practice usually RISC 2

3 Most operations are on scalar quantities (see RISC notes)
Why Superscalar? Most operations are on scalar quantities (see RISC notes) Improve these operations to get an overall improvement 3

4 General Superscalar Organization
4

5 Many pipeline stages need less than half a clock cycle
Superpipelined Many pipeline stages need less than half a clock cycle Double internal clock speed gets two tasks per external clock cycle Superscalar allows parallel fetch execute 5

6 Superscalar v Superpipeline
Clock cycle당 두개의 파이프라인 단계 수행

7 프로그램 명령어를 병렬로 수행하는 정도(degree를 의미함)
Limitations Instruction level parallelism (ILP) ILP is supported by Compiler based optimisation + Hardware techniques ILP is Limited by True data dependency Procedural dependency Resource conflicts Output dependency Antidependency 프로그램 명령어를 병렬로 수행하는 정도(degree를 의미함) 7

8 Can fetch and decode second instruction in parallel with first
True Data Dependency ADD r1, r2 (r1 := r1+r2;) MOVE r3,r1 (r3 := r1;) Can fetch and decode second instruction in parallel with first Can NOT execute second instruction until first is finished 8

9 Procedural Dependency
Can not execute instructions after a branch in parallel with instructions before a branch Also, if instruction length is not fixed, instructions have to be decoded to find out how many fetches are needed This prevents simultaneous fetches 9

10 Can duplicate resources
Resource Conflict Two or more instructions requiring access to the same resource at the same time e.g. two arithmetic instructions Can duplicate resources e.g. have two arithmetic units 10

11 Effect of Dependencies
11

12 Instruction level parallelism
Design Issues Instruction level parallelism If instructions in a sequence are independent, execution can be overlapped Governed by data and procedural dependency Machine Parallelism Ability to take advantage of instruction level parallelism Governed by the number of instructions that can be fetched and executed at the same time (number of parallel pipelines) Governed by the speed and sophistication of the mechanisms that the processor uses to find independent instructions 12

13 Instruction Issue Policy
refers to the process of initiating instruction execution in the processor’s functional units Instruction issue policy : refers to the protocol used to issue instructions 13

14 Instruction Issue Policy
The processor is trying to look ahead of the current point of execution to locate instructions that can be brought into the pipeline and executed Three types of orderings are important in this regard: Order in which instructions are fetched Order in which instructions are executed Order in which instructions change registers and memory The more sophisticated the processor, the less it is bound by a strict relationship between these orderings To optimize utilization of the various pipeline elements, the processor will need to alter one or more of these orderings with respect to the ordering to be found in a strict sequential execution The one constraint on the processor is that the result must be correct Thus, the processor must accommodate the various dependencies and conflicts discussed earlier 14

15 Superscalar Instruction Issue Policies
In-order issue with in-order completion In-order issue with out-of-order completion Out-of-order issue with out-of-order completion 15

16 In-Order Issue In-Order Completion
Issue instructions in the order they occur Not very efficient May fetch >1 instruction Instructions must stall if necessary 16

17 In-Order Issue In-Order Completion (Diagram)
가정: 두 개의 명령어를 동시에 fetch하여 decoding할 수 있음 실행 unit은 두 개의 정수 연산과 한 개의 부동 소수점 연산 동시 수행 두 개의 write-back 파이프라인 단계 가짐 제한: I1을 실행하는데 두 사이클이 필요. I3/I4 resource conflict. I5/I6도 resource conflict I5는 I4의 결과값을 사용함. ※ I1과 I2는 data dependency를 가지지 않음. 17

18 In-Order Issue Out-of-Order Completion
Output dependency R3:= R3 + R5; (I1) R4:= R3 + 1; (I2) R3:= R5 + 1; (I3) If I3 completes before I1, the result from I1 will be wrong - output (write-write) dependency Cf. If I2 depends on result of I1, then we call it data dependency 참고) 가정에선 Data dependency 없다고 했음 Output Dependency A commonly used naming convention for data dependencies is the following: Read-after-Write or RAW (flow dependency), Write-after-Write or WAW (output dependency), and Write-After-Read or WAR (anti-dependency). 18

19 In-Order Issue Out-of-Order Completion (Diagram)
제한: I1을 실행하는데 두 사이클이 필요. I3/I4 resource conflict. I5/I6도 resource conflict I5는 I4의 결과값을 사용함. ※ I1과 I2는 data dependency를 가지지 않음. I2를 I1보다 이전에 실행 및 종료(WB)할 수 있음 (가정에서 data dependency가 없다고 했음). 이 때문에,I2의 결과를 Cycle #3에서 write-back함 이는 결과적으로 I3 실행을 이전 경우보다 더 빨리 할 수 있도록 하며, I3의 결과를 I1의 결과와 함께 Cycle #4에 write-back할 수 있게 됨 두 개의 write-back 파이프라인 단계 가짐. 즉, 최대 두개의 결과값을 동시에 write-back 할 수 있음. R3:= R3 + R5; (I1) R4:= R3 + 1; (I2) R3:= R5 + 1; (I3) 만일, 왼쪽과 같은 경우라면 I1과 I3의 실행 순서에 의해 최종 R3의 값이 바뀌게 되며, 이를 output dependency (write-after-write dependency라고 함) 19

20 Out-of-Order Issue Out-of-Order Completion
Decouple decode pipeline from execution pipeline Can continue to fetch and decode until this pipeline is full When a functional unit becomes available an instruction can be executed Since instructions have been decoded, processor can look ahead 20

21 Out-of-Order Issue Out-of-Order Completion (Diagram)
In-Order Issue Out-of-Order Completion Out-of-Order Issue Out-of-Order Completion (Diagram) 제한: I1을 실행하는데 두 사이클이 필요. I3/I4 resource conflict. I5/I6도 resource conflict I5는 I4의 결과값을 사용함. ※ I1과 I2는 data dependency를 가지지 않음. 가정: I5는 I4에 의존하지만, I6는 I4에 의존하지 않음  이 때문에, I6가 I5보다 먼저 issuing이 되어 실행될 수 있음.  I5와 I6의 순서를 바꿔서 수행함  Execute 및 write 단계에서 1 cycle save 가능 각 cycle에서 두 개의 명령어들이 인출되어 decoding 단계로 들어감 제한: I1을 실행하는데 두 사이클이 필요하다 I3와 I4는 동일한 functional unit을 사용하고자 하며, 이 때문에 서로 conflict함 I5는 I4의 결과값을 사용함 I5와 I6는 동일한 functional unit을 사용하고자 하며, 이 때문에 서로 conflict함 ※ I1과 I2는 data dependency를 가지지 않음. 21

22 Antidependency Write-after-read dependency R3:=R3 + R5; (I1)
I3 can not complete before I2 starts as I2 needs a value in R3 and I3 changes R3 Antidependency is used because the constraint is similar to that of a true data dependency, but reversed Instead of the first instruction producing a value that the second instruction uses, the second instruction destroys a value that the first instruction uses. Cf. Read-after-write dependency: true data dependency 22

23 Register renaming : duplication of resource !
Out-of-order issue with out-of-order completion may give rise to the possibility of output dependencies and antidependencies. Output and antidependencies occur because register contents may not reflect the correct ordering from the program May result in a pipeline stall Registers allocated dynamically i.e. registers are not specifically named Register renaming : duplication of resource ! 23

24 Register Renaming example
R3:=R3 + R5; (I1) R4:=R3 + 1; (I2) R3:=R5 + 1; (I3) R7:=R3 + R4; (I4) Register Renaming example 참고) 이전 예에서는 I1과 I2가 R3로 인한 data dependency가 없다고 봤음. (즉, I1 실행 결과인 R3를 I2에서 읽는게 아니고 I2의 R3는 I1의 원래의 R3값임) I1과 I2의 우측, R3 값을 각각 R3a와 R3b로 복사했으며, I1,I2가 동시에 실행될 수 있게 함 (레지스터 하나를 두개의 명령어가 동시에 읽을 수 없기 때문에) 하지만, 만약 I1과 I2가 동시에 실행되지 않고, out of order issue에 의해, 어떤 다른 명령어가 I1과 I2 사이에 들어와서, I1이 실행이 끝나서 R3값이 업데이트 된 후에, I2가 읽힌다면, I2의 실행 결과는 원래 의도한 것과 다른 값이 될 수도 있음(I1, I2 동시 실행 보장해야 함) 즉, 쉽게 생각하면, 이를 해결하는방법은 I1과 I2의 우측 R3를 모두 R3a로 하면 되는 것 같은데, 안되는 이유는 레지스터 R3a를 동시에 읽을 수 없기때문에 이렇게 함 R3b:=R3a + R5a (I1) R4b:=R3b (I2) R3c:=R5a (I3) R7b:=R3c + R4b (I4) Without subscript refers to logical register in instruction With subscript is hardware register allocated Note R3a R3b R3c 그리고 R3c를 I3에서 사용함으로서 I2와의 antidependency 문제가 없어졌으며, I1과 I3의 output dependency도 없어짐. 24

25 Duplication of Resources Out of order issue Renaming
Machine Parallelism Duplication of Resources Out of order issue Renaming Not worth duplication functions without register renaming Need instruction window large enough (more than 8) 25

26 Speedups of Machine Organizations Without Procedural Dependencies
26

27 Gives two cycle delay if branch taken
Branch Prediction 80486 fetches both next sequential instruction after branch and branch target instruction Gives two cycle delay if branch taken 27

28 Calculate result of branch before unusable instructions pre-fetched
RISC - Delayed Branch Calculate result of branch before unusable instructions pre-fetched Always execute single instruction immediately following branch Keeps pipeline full while fetching new instruction stream Not as good for superscalar Multiple instructions need to execute in delay slot Instruction dependence problems Revert to branch prediction 28

29 Superscalar Execution
29

30 Superscalar Implementation
Simultaneously fetch multiple instructions Logic to determine true dependencies involving register values Mechanisms to communicate these values Mechanisms to initiate multiple instructions in parallel Resources for parallel execution of multiple instructions Mechanisms for committing process state in correct order 30


Download ppt "Chapter 14 Instruction Level Parallelism and Superscalar Processors"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google