Global Leadership 리더십의 문화인류학적 이해 진재혁 교수
리더십과 문화와의 관계 리더십의 세계관: World view differences affect leaders / leadership in dramatically diverse ways 리더십의 모양: Forms vary for every leadership function 리더십의 가치: Values differ in every leadership domain
문화인류학적 관찰 신분 Status issues 역활 Role issues Achieved 수고해서 얻어지는 것 Ascribed 태어나면서 주어지는것 역활 Role issues Expected behavior Related to status “Role expectations” Role expectations change overtime. Role expectations reflect cultural values.
Status / Role 신분과 역활에 관한 문화적 갈등 Status / role confusion is likely between cultures because of different expectations similar status associated with different roles similar role associated with different statuses In some cases parallel status between cultures is missing, e.g., anthropologist, pastor, missionary, evangelist.... market bargain negotiation.
타문화권 리더십 비교 Key Variables to Consider From Geert Hofstede (Geert Hofstede, “Motivation, Leadership and Organization: Do American Theories Apply Abroad?” Organizational Dynamics, Summer, 1980. AMACOM a division of American Management Association, pp. 42-63)
Key Variables Power Distance 권력의 거리 Uncertainty Avoidance 확실치않은것을 꺼려하는 정도 Individualism-Collectivism 개인주의적인 성향과 집단주의적인 성향 Masculinity-Femininity (Assertiveness-Nurture) 외유내강과 내유외강
Power Distance 권력의 거리 “The extent to which a society accepts the fact that power in institutions and organizations is distributed unequally” (Hofstede 1980:45).
Uncertainty Avoidance 확실치않은것을 꺼려하는 정도 “The extent to which a society feels threatened by uncertain and ambiguous situations...” (Hofstede 1980:45).
Individualism-Collectivism 개인주의적인 성향과 집단주의적인 성향 Individualism-- “a loosely knit social framework in which people are supposed to take care of themselves” Collectivism -- “a tight social framework in which people distinguish between in-groups and out-groups (Hofstede 1980:45)
Masculinity-Femininity 남성적 성향과 여성적 성향 Acquisitiveness or Assertiveness vs. Nurture
팀사역 LEADING A TEAM MINISTRY
DEFINING A TEAM MINISTRY “ a collection of people who come together for an agreed-upon purpose, and, by relying upon collaboration together, gain an optimum level of success and goal achievement (Dennis Dean Ladd 1994).
Staff Ministry 와 Team Ministry 차이점 한국적 팀 사역
Characteristics of Effective Team 목적/방향/비전/사역가치관: 같은 은사중심적 사역 (전문성): 각각 관계중심적 사역 (협력): 서로 팀 리더십: 먼저
PHILOSOPHY OF MINISTRY Effective Team Ministry VISION AND MISSION INTE- GRITY RESPECT COMMIT MENT TRUST GIFT-ORIENTED PHILOSOPHY OF MINISTRY TEAM LEADER
팀 리더 Team Leader 비전 Perspective on Vision 파워 Perspective on Power system 은사 Perspective on Giftedness 리더십개발 Perspective on Leadership development
팀 리더십의 organizational culture 조직문화
ATTRACTING QUALITY Team Members “HERE LIES A MAN WHO KNEW HOW TO BRING INTO HIS SERVICE MEN BETTER THAN HE WAS HIMSELF” (from tombstone of Carnegie)